Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 18:23:53 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 825FB6E08B0200518FB2083F08E3CBE74755F11086302DFC9C6AA267331544D9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Não é verdade que o Santo Sudário tenha sua veracidade cientificamente comprovada, e ao contrário do que diz o post, a Igreja Católica não o reconhece de forma oficial. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/articles/c9r1wk42pywo https://revistagalileu.globo.com/Ciencia/Arqueologia/noticia/2018/07/estudos-revelam-novos-indicios-de-que-santo-sudario-nao-e-verdadeiro.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779894664167854202
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 825FB6E08B0200518FB2083F08E3CBE74755F11086302DFC9C6AA267331544D9
  • createdAtMillis - 1713205433127
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779894664167854202825FB6E08B0200518FB2083F08E3CBE74755F11086302DFC9C6AA267331544D9