Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-15 10:12:26 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 807E8AAA2C00478AF84F9C370AAC2EA799C1844520F5E487FA4612B4AC325AEF
Participant Details

Original Note:

Mr Bragg has zero professional competence in this. The Cass Review is the most comprehensive and rigorous assessment of available research in history in this area. Many studies were discounted for poor quality and lack of long-term tracking of patients. https://cass.independent-review.uk/home/publications/final-report/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1779205032644120758
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 807E8AAA2C00478AF84F9C370AAC2EA799C1844520F5E487FA4612B4AC325AEF
  • createdAtMillis - 1713175946097
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1779205032644120758807E8AAA2C00478AF84F9C370AAC2EA799C1844520F5E487FA4612B4AC325AEF