Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 00:14:56 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1
Participant Details

Original Note:

裁判所での個別事例の判断基準があいまいのままであり、「子の利益」との関連も不明確である https://www.jlaf.jp/kyoiku/2024/0409_1727.html 共同親権のメリットとデメリット https://www.riconhiroba.com/children/joint-custody.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778445916380475490
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1
  • createdAtMillis - 1712880896922
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177844591638047549015E122191C4B4A817F11F9437FB7A268760FF1E12D5AD1D88CDA1D467CF8E2C1