Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 08:46:02 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4062320548E1C6B7A2803DD5C662834AB25825B6291C7D20C9290712EA3E39CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

このポストの前半は「公園は憩いの場であるべき」という個人的な感想を表明したもので、過去の宮下公園がどのような状態であったかには関係ありません。よって、誤解を招くポストではなく、コミュニティノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778262866866712808
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4062320548E1C6B7A2803DD5C662834AB25825B6291C7D20C9290712EA3E39CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1712825162062
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17782628668667128084062320548E1C6B7A2803DD5C662834AB25825B6291C7D20C9290712EA3E39CB