Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-11 08:10:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B862685F5BDD7F3684929862A37BC4773C034F4E75027AFD793738F42AD7BBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN A peer reviewed study supports the opinion expressed in the post, which is clearly not an expression of fact either. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778210911267803293
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B862685F5BDD7F3684929862A37BC4773C034F4E75027AFD793738F42AD7BBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1712823008271
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17782109112678032935B862685F5BDD7F3684929862A37BC4773C034F4E75027AFD793738F42AD7BBF