Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-12 14:33:45 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B862685F5BDD7F3684929862A37BC4773C034F4E75027AFD793738F42AD7BBF
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - you can't use the authors of tbe Cass study to prove that the Cass study is unbiased; of course they would say they are not.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1778062883881910612
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5B862685F5BDD7F3684929862A37BC4773C034F4E75027AFD793738F42AD7BBF
  • createdAtMillis - 1712932425859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17780628838819106125B862685F5BDD7F3684929862A37BC4773C034F4E75027AFD793738F42AD7BBF