Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-04 11:36:02 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0FD03DBDAFAA59BE1589221F820A47620E46D9B8A4AB83D1645E78D9EB8687CB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The original post makes no mention of a "foreign court" and does not say anything about how the uk was a primary signatory or not. The proposed note makes suggestions that aren't even claims that the original post makes, thus the note is irrelevant and NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775824775249526888
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0FD03DBDAFAA59BE1589221F820A47620E46D9B8A4AB83D1645E78D9EB8687CB
  • createdAtMillis - 1712230562616
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17758247752495268880FD03DBDAFAA59BE1589221F820A47620E46D9B8A4AB83D1645E78D9EB8687CB