Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-06 14:05:43 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 83BE54645B62ED41D00427C6B726B05B1421367C5CCC0280368B82160C0FF28F
Participant Details

Original Note:

The resolution encompassed more than just making 'food a right'; it entailed supplementary measures and possibly obligations. Thus, countries voting 'no' cannot be interpreted as opposing a resolution of 'food as a right' on its own. https://usun.usmission.gov/explanation-of-vote-of-the-third-committee-adoption-of-the-right-to-food-resolution/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775737764505702885
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 83BE54645B62ED41D00427C6B726B05B1421367C5CCC0280368B82160C0FF28F
  • createdAtMillis - 1712412343920
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 177573776450570288583BE54645B62ED41D00427C6B726B05B1421367C5CCC0280368B82160C0FF28F