Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-04-02 17:01:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5BDF555772C2A455CC4F06A5A031BBD862A57148CD30D550EE07002D0D1D91FE
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note on the historian's creditials is incredibly misleading. If you read the entirety of the link provided in the note, she's an expert on more than just gender studies, with relevant historical background in Japanese history within the relevant time-frame.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1775193435000963301
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5BDF555772C2A455CC4F06A5A031BBD862A57148CD30D550EE07002D0D1D91FE
  • createdAtMillis - 1712077292418
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17751934350009633015BDF555772C2A455CC4F06A5A031BBD862A57148CD30D550EE07002D0D1D91FE