Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-30 15:34:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FAEA746F19F0B5942CD834268A6573A267756F9B5BBA461C60DC9879FCE4D868
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, Jordan Peterson is not discrediting the authors' based on their names. He is clearly remarking about the humour in a paper which refers to penises, where the authors are named variations of "wang". Also, there are clear typos in the currently proposed community note.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1774043802807751114
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FAEA746F19F0B5942CD834268A6573A267756F9B5BBA461C60DC9879FCE4D868
  • createdAtMillis - 1711812881405
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1774043802807751114FAEA746F19F0B5942CD834268A6573A267756F9B5BBA461C60DC9879FCE4D868