Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-25 21:06:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: ED4307150E345F49055AD75F26ACFDD89D6E075E8A95FCDFB60E585935764AC4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The site is not rife with trash talk or lies, it’s a platform that proffers diverse opinions to give a holistic examination of all sides of an argument. If anything, X is preserving democratic principles enshrined in our constitution and offers are more unbiased view https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/journalism-age-social-media

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1772344265794081216
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - ED4307150E345F49055AD75F26ACFDD89D6E075E8A95FCDFB60E585935764AC4
  • createdAtMillis - 1711400782840
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1772344265794081216ED4307150E345F49055AD75F26ACFDD89D6E075E8A95FCDFB60E585935764AC4