Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-19 13:28:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 149FCF2ADFAB56E04D7415EE58621EA8434719DB206DE683915D66C166B2FE7B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN La otra nota incluye un estudio cuyas conclusiones están ampliamente limitadas como ya se indica en el documento, no es en absoluto fiable, ni indicativo de lo que la nota afirma. https://behaviorandlawjournal.com/BLJ/article/view/86

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1770069285592871220
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 149FCF2ADFAB56E04D7415EE58621EA8434719DB206DE683915D66C166B2FE7B
  • createdAtMillis - 1710854923709
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1770069285592871220149FCF2ADFAB56E04D7415EE58621EA8434719DB206DE683915D66C166B2FE7B