Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-16 19:34:35 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DCEE7DE0C4CF5A8F9117B74E2239E2C7E1E22F1F4F4AA1E3BEE46A7E67BFA1AA
Participant Details

Original Note:

El artículo científico plantea un análisis de riesgos con una metodología ideada para brotes y no pandemias. Además, tiene importantes limitaciones y sus conclusiones son claramente subjetivas. https://www.nationalgeographic.com.es/ciencia/pandemia-covid19-fue-natural-o-artificial-respuesta-no-es-tan-sencilla_21863

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1769038500941201769
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DCEE7DE0C4CF5A8F9117B74E2239E2C7E1E22F1F4F4AA1E3BEE46A7E67BFA1AA
  • createdAtMillis - 1710617675966
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1769038500941201769DCEE7DE0C4CF5A8F9117B74E2239E2C7E1E22F1F4F4AA1E3BEE46A7E67BFA1AA