Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-15 13:19:03 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D43D1C1F7184AB03D49C61A8426CB292307B4A8D4BE54505E5417288BDDA6CEC
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post is accurate, no community note needed. Community notes saying China has laws “banning” websites are 1) Inaccurate comparisons: China laws regarding internet hosting & govt data access are very different from proposed US bill; and 2) not relevant to the post’s accuracy https://x.com/nikstankovic_/status/1768475241741738455?s=46&t=xY6Z_KqtLNkij4l9Gzc97w

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1768594406162977133
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D43D1C1F7184AB03D49C61A8426CB292307B4A8D4BE54505E5417288BDDA6CEC
  • createdAtMillis - 1710508743109
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1768594406162977133D43D1C1F7184AB03D49C61A8426CB292307B4A8D4BE54505E5417288BDDA6CEC