Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-10 19:52:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3FA421EC4D7A0C9CF6C41A63B8BACD9B9E8BBB82D64AA8759C38E9C332CE6AB9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the posted note leads to the NYT own site detailing what's INCLUDED in their list, and how that data is compiled. They are still able to pick and choose and so it's still Editorial Content and not a comprehensive full list

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1766842163302658295
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3FA421EC4D7A0C9CF6C41A63B8BACD9B9E8BBB82D64AA8759C38E9C332CE6AB9
  • createdAtMillis - 1710100379107
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17668421633026582953FA421EC4D7A0C9CF6C41A63B8BACD9B9E8BBB82D64AA8759C38E9C332CE6AB9