Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-09 07:15:39 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8B5D6AA531D7AD1183B6FCDB4A74AE32C8DC8BFC665F848C0FB16B6A96F8CDA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

Der Bericht des Rechnungshofs erwähnt Habeck nicht, sondern kritisiert die verfehlte Politik des letzten Jahrzehnts. https://twitter.com/ChrisStoecker/status/1765781346654273867?s=20 S 23: https://www.bundesrechnungshof.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Berichte/2024/energiewende-volltext.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1765787426855809317
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 8B5D6AA531D7AD1183B6FCDB4A74AE32C8DC8BFC665F848C0FB16B6A96F8CDA0
createdAtMillis - 1709968539049
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 17657874268558093178B5D6AA531D7AD1183B6FCDB4A74AE32C8DC8BFC665F848C0FB16B6A96F8CDA0