Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-02 22:11:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5AFDEAE3CB07408BEBB66E1D286FB8F61439244198A73D2502D53DEFDEA6A162
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le thread est organisé de manière à décridibiliser la concurrence en rangeant les entreprises de la moins sérieuse à la plus sérieuse d'après l'auteur Tweet résumant son avis sur les compétiteurs sérieux: https://x.com/BB27000/status/1763939625612026299?s=20 https://x.com/BB27000/status/1763939623087096032?s=20 Ces deux compétiteurs sérieux n'apparaissent qu'après 10 tweets

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1764011388144394558
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5AFDEAE3CB07408BEBB66E1D286FB8F61439244198A73D2502D53DEFDEA6A162
createdAtMillis - 1709417518422
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 17640113881443945585AFDEAE3CB07408BEBB66E1D286FB8F61439244198A73D2502D53DEFDEA6A162