Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-03-07 22:17:03 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FF649C62663B8E712C0B81FCD2D73392E77A86CE596F9B615366A81EC0FAFB87
Participant Details

Original Note:

No note needed, this is clearly an opinion. If you object, reply in comments. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2018/06/18/distinguishing-between-factual-and-opinion-statements-in-the-news/ https://engineering.dartmouth.edu/news/opinions-are-not-facts-how-scientific-curiosity-may-save-us

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1763932779354444148
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FF649C62663B8E712C0B81FCD2D73392E77A86CE596F9B615366A81EC0FAFB87
  • createdAtMillis - 1709849823023
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1763932779354444148FF649C62663B8E712C0B81FCD2D73392E77A86CE596F9B615366A81EC0FAFB87