Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 14:03:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E2C2B61A21D33EC3EA55195CE6F1AFF848144128EF5BB1AFD9B873D4C94FB8CD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Jos hesaria syytetään perseilystä niin ei tämän kumoamiseen voi olla validi lähde että hesari itse kiistää. Ainahan kohde kiistää perseilyn. Vai pitäiskö jokaiseen lehtijuttuun jossa kohde kiistää tapahtuneen laittaa note?

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762793071861735629
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E2C2B61A21D33EC3EA55195CE6F1AFF848144128EF5BB1AFD9B873D4C94FB8CD
  • createdAtMillis - 1709129008601
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1762793071861735629E2C2B61A21D33EC3EA55195CE6F1AFF848144128EF5BB1AFD9B873D4C94FB8CD