Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-02-28 06:32:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 97A8B0FFA37E856E478FF8D7CBECA497D3A0CD06BC2BD09E6561766665D1934D
Participant Details
Original Note:
CN's provided so far indicate the tweet is not factual because the Court ruled the mandate directives were "unlawful" whereas the tweet says "illegal". In common parlance these terms are synonyms, and therefore the tweet is factual and not misleading. https://australianemergencylaw.com/2024/02/27/covid-directions-to-qas-and-qps-employees-held-to-be-invalid/ https://www.thesaurus.com/browse/unlawful
All Note Details