Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-28 08:23:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 39B701C1E9F4E7250149887DF82453665D9F786AE70054CEE266E8ECD257933B
Participant Details

Original Note:

Wichtiger Kontext: Alle zentralen Punkte der Correctiv Recherche wurden durch das Urteil nicht berührt. Correctiv hat in 2 von 3 Punkten Recht bekommen. https://www.lto.de/recht/nachrichten/n/beschluss-lg-hamburg-324-o-61-24-vosgerau-correctiv/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1762496801691611490
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 39B701C1E9F4E7250149887DF82453665D9F786AE70054CEE266E8ECD257933B
  • createdAtMillis - 1709108639793
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 176249680169161149039B701C1E9F4E7250149887DF82453665D9F786AE70054CEE266E8ECD257933B