Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-24 13:46:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 962B071241790F2FA8C7C41795B7DB80E72572B5FB5DB3942D4B8D18FDD980CC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - this is clearly satirical and/or joking. There is no such thing as a gender expert (in this context). Wikipedia is not a reliable source in this instance. Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1761098633468854321
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 962B071241790F2FA8C7C41795B7DB80E72572B5FB5DB3942D4B8D18FDD980CC
  • createdAtMillis - 1708782366940
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1761098633468854321962B071241790F2FA8C7C41795B7DB80E72572B5FB5DB3942D4B8D18FDD980CC