Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 21:43:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8FB11D2C95D9B15C364051689196E8E11429BCF0A0417A7555BA3FED6E455A50
Participant Details

Original Note:

il post è corretto. l'articolo condiviso dal post è invece intriso di valutazioni e allarmismi no vax che non trovano giustificazione nello studio in commento, che al contrario, conferma la marginalità dei casi avversi riferiti alla somministrazione di vaccini anti covid.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1760233767342391636
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8FB11D2C95D9B15C364051689196E8E11429BCF0A0417A7555BA3FED6E455A50
  • createdAtMillis - 1708551812855
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17602337673423916368FB11D2C95D9B15C364051689196E8E11429BCF0A0417A7555BA3FED6E455A50