Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-21 09:43:18 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 64E23C6D815D5A65681F637C9930925B543922538FFAD7E56F9DE3402B585DF7
Participant Details

Original Note:

Viittaan Satosen lähteeseen ja HS:n uutiseen: https://www.hs.fi/politiikka/art-2000010241974.html Ruotsin oikeustieteellinen kirjallisuus puhuu Satosen mainitsemista tunneista mutta vallitsevaa käytäntöä ei ole, koska lakkoja on ollut niin vähän. Ministerin puheen valmistelijaa on vaikea syyttää, mutta konteksti on vajaa.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1760019382724702648
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 64E23C6D815D5A65681F637C9930925B543922538FFAD7E56F9DE3402B585DF7
createdAtMillis - 1708508598707
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 176001938272470264864E23C6D815D5A65681F637C9930925B543922538FFAD7E56F9DE3402B585DF7