Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-18 05:25:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 718FB6B484C4BAEA7D9DB2D2E2E98C747A1AD3CD63EB9A5C8A4EAC563580B9BE
Participant Details

Original Note:

The judge set the value based on the tax appraisal value, instead of fair market value, choosing to vastly undervalue the property. The judge had discretion to pick how to value the property, he chose the valuation method that would result in the lowest possible value. NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1759035620184428844
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 718FB6B484C4BAEA7D9DB2D2E2E98C747A1AD3CD63EB9A5C8A4EAC563580B9BE
  • createdAtMillis - 1708233949461
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1759035620184428844718FB6B484C4BAEA7D9DB2D2E2E98C747A1AD3CD63EB9A5C8A4EAC563580B9BE