Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-05 03:29:33 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D28E102B71D1CF47C92ABF7E4200285E0A0947C06476D3F56C8B9C76DAFE05DA
Participant Details

Original Note:

No credible outlets have run such a story, and the post does not cite any evidence beyond a quote from an unnamed "Legal Expert." This account has a track record of posting unverified stories which later turn out to be false. https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL1N37Y1O5/ https://www.ibtimes.co.in/first-cnn-now-youtube-twitter-account-take-different-identities-spread-fake-news-825438

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1754300029160828977
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D28E102B71D1CF47C92ABF7E4200285E0A0947C06476D3F56C8B9C76DAFE05DA
  • createdAtMillis - 1707103773879
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1754300029160828977D28E102B71D1CF47C92ABF7E4200285E0A0947C06476D3F56C8B9C76DAFE05DA