Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-04 08:53:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 361AF5FC2F3BF2E94C54861D3840D73B4AB9D4F5A2AD5994C434D76FA3C7E9F0
Participant Details

Original Note:

The ICJ's ruling on January 26 specifies that the court was not deciding whether Israel's acts in Gaza violate the Genocide Convention, simply whether the acts South Africa accused Israel of violating would, if proven, make a plausible case for such (see p. 12 pp. 30). https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/192/192-20240126-ord-01-00-en.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1753912170348167489
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 361AF5FC2F3BF2E94C54861D3840D73B4AB9D4F5A2AD5994C434D76FA3C7E9F0
  • createdAtMillis - 1707036788961
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1753912170348167489361AF5FC2F3BF2E94C54861D3840D73B4AB9D4F5A2AD5994C434D76FA3C7E9F0