Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-31 17:48:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1E510059B35646E4BC598D493602FB27334729473A7EA52111D27944CDA971F6
Participant Details

Original Note:

if you’re going to prove your case, it’s better not to use sources made by the party in question

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1752694000283521500
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1E510059B35646E4BC598D493602FB27334729473A7EA52111D27944CDA971F6
  • createdAtMillis - 1706723331859
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17526940002835215001E510059B35646E4BC598D493602FB27334729473A7EA52111D27944CDA971F6