Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-01-30 17:41:54 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 11DD9A6DF6DB7CD0DE16E47065A2A7D2FED07E58B2DEFCD157FFB0AF11DCB504
Participant Details
Original Note:
The case was not to define racism, but rather to prove that Fox was libellous in calling queer people paedophiles as a slur. The ruling confirmed Fox’s past behaviours have racist connotations , therefore other parties were not damaging to point out he was being racist. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/laurence-fox-loses-libel-case-high-court-b2486600.html
All Note Details