Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-29 10:45:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E3726B0932FDD41E3191EE551CB2A6B89BCD8C76C15A81C07C47450F7AED41B8
Participant Details

Original Note:

Scholarly Iceberg Starling's CN proposal is filled with LIES. The ENTIRE The Intercept article, 100% of it from start to finish, is about the subject of this tweet, the article completely matches the tweet's claims, and it names MANY SPECIFIC people, not just "unnamed sources".

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1751896354547224724
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E3726B0932FDD41E3191EE551CB2A6B89BCD8C76C15A81C07C47450F7AED41B8
  • createdAtMillis - 1706525147273
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1751896354547224724E3726B0932FDD41E3191EE551CB2A6B89BCD8C76C15A81C07C47450F7AED41B8