Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-27 00:17:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C53966C176B664CE4D8C122027005EE455C5349173CBA1FC0B9AC73BD78FA04F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - JTA article linked in the note clearly states: "the ruling repeatedly made clear that the court had not found evidence of genocide, only that South Africa, in bringing the case, had made a plausible case that the Palestinians deserved protective measures from genocide."

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1750918261682643219
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C53966C176B664CE4D8C122027005EE455C5349173CBA1FC0B9AC73BD78FA04F
  • createdAtMillis - 1706314670127
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1750918261682643219C53966C176B664CE4D8C122027005EE455C5349173CBA1FC0B9AC73BD78FA04F