Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-24 01:28:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5C03786DFC2927096D6604348CA68B1A43E6E4E26C5113949AB9FD9E8E7B74F9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The note writers can't disprove the fraudolent nature of mail voting that the lawsuit exposes so they resort to calling people conspiracy theorists.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749693847305634261
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5C03786DFC2927096D6604348CA68B1A43E6E4E26C5113949AB9FD9E8E7B74F9
  • createdAtMillis - 1706059708259
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17496938473056342615C03786DFC2927096D6604348CA68B1A43E6E4E26C5113949AB9FD9E8E7B74F9