Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-22 07:25:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9C46EE160C3F7243C25D49BBFCB04F8AFEEBA270B71EC19235D38244C3DF5082
Participant Details

Original Note:

Most of the websites that promote Essiac use opinions not backed up by research. Some of this information is often anecdotal evidence. The Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre tested Essiac in the laboratory. They found it had no anti-cancer features. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/treatment/complementary-alternative-therapies/individual-therapies/essiac https://www.asbestos.com/treatment/alternative/essiac-tea/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1749320194886181258
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9C46EE160C3F7243C25D49BBFCB04F8AFEEBA270B71EC19235D38244C3DF5082
  • createdAtMillis - 1705908307330
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17493201948861812589C46EE160C3F7243C25D49BBFCB04F8AFEEBA270B71EC19235D38244C3DF5082