Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-18 05:59:41 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le parquet de Paris, cité dans l’article, évoque une qualification des faits en cours. C’est un degré d’information plus avancé que l’article du parisien, qui cite des sources policières pour évoquer l’apologie du terrorisme. L’article de franceinfo est donc prudent et factuel.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1747815578318893106
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9
  • createdAtMillis - 1705557581567
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17478155783188931066EC704BF9BB1ED5A4FA464ADE807B7C26A181BA79235036B2D0815ACE7A50FF9