Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-16 21:50:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E6571FDE7B8039AB0AA938DD5A86E81F1280E020FBDF37695B7E55383C35A6F5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN, the total cost/benefit of the royal family is irrelevant to the cost of the official portrait in the article. In addition, misleading re: sovereign grant being decreased as it is set to increase significantly over the next two years https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jul/20/king-charles-to-receive-huge-pay-rise-from-uk-taxpayers

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1747240439655157996
participantId -
raterParticipantId - E6571FDE7B8039AB0AA938DD5A86E81F1280E020FBDF37695B7E55383C35A6F5
createdAtMillis - 1705441850848
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1747240439655157996E6571FDE7B8039AB0AA938DD5A86E81F1280E020FBDF37695B7E55383C35A6F5