Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-15 16:03:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 97963F1F97EF4E5B6B004853A89EBEB8020510DEB6156FC6AF74C8C42B372763
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Clinton case, brought by Judicial Watch, concerned taped interviews between the President and a historian. It never went to SCOTUS. https://casetext.com/case/judicial-watch-inc-v-natl-archives-records-admin Furthermore, the decision passed down was that the tapes were personal records whereas the documents Trump took were official / classified https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2023/06/23/clinton-sock-case-not-relevant-to-trumps-classified-docs-case-experts-say/70325388007/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746870994155741573
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 97963F1F97EF4E5B6B004853A89EBEB8020510DEB6156FC6AF74C8C42B372763
  • createdAtMillis - 1705334615630
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174687099415574157397963F1F97EF4E5B6B004853A89EBEB8020510DEB6156FC6AF74C8C42B372763