Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-02-06 23:54:15 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 40AD267E7D1B40FFAC2129B33CE64D2241A54AE72EDC2C163628805B2B21CDBB
Participant Details

Original Note:

The study concerned, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/11/10/1621 is in a very low impact predatory journal. It is based on questionnaires, and does not report other than expected temporally effects of a vaccination, most not even statistically different.Large studies show no safety concerns: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(22)00054-8/fulltext https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784015

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1746659976364388408
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 40AD267E7D1B40FFAC2129B33CE64D2241A54AE72EDC2C163628805B2B21CDBB
createdAtMillis - 1707263655479
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 174665997636438840840AD267E7D1B40FFAC2129B33CE64D2241A54AE72EDC2C163628805B2B21CDBB