Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-13 07:25:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 436768F8AFDAC5880865DBB447D75AE0F9522B2B0AD25D4BD2C197FE45FC819C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The published paper is not even a week old, and the findings in the animal study have yet to be scrutinized and confirmed in separate studies. It is premature to dismiss the findings outright and is unethical to censor the reporting. Link to the article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38198049/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1746045527580356951
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 436768F8AFDAC5880865DBB447D75AE0F9522B2B0AD25D4BD2C197FE45FC819C
  • createdAtMillis - 1705130718750
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1746045527580356951436768F8AFDAC5880865DBB447D75AE0F9522B2B0AD25D4BD2C197FE45FC819C