Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-12 18:23:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC9984FBB5864308F50269599E71ED39832773EE22C8442C1D9CC2E451939D79
Participant Details

Original Note:

OP has selectively chosen certain parts of multiple websites to try and back up their claim. Calling it "Sadiqland" is unprofessional and shows the CPS think tank is biased. They have the worst transparency rating of all think tanks in the uk https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/who-funds-you/centre-for-policy-studies/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1745843363780169759
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC9984FBB5864308F50269599E71ED39832773EE22C8442C1D9CC2E451939D79
  • createdAtMillis - 1705083828257
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1745843363780169759EC9984FBB5864308F50269599E71ED39832773EE22C8442C1D9CC2E451939D79