Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-09 13:33:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00F8AE1115D13ED05E6D53BE440FEBFAA3ED2C88FFEB4C89DDFA471D7C783601
Participant Details

Original Note:

The fact that it was covered in detail by Private Eye does not mean it was widely read. PE has a subs base of 246,784 https://www.eyeads.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/Private-Eye-Media-Pack-2023.pdf It has been covered by marginal news outlets, Private Eye, Regional BBC programmes and Computer Weekly. So it is fair to say it has not been covered 'widely'.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744437141608763615
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00F8AE1115D13ED05E6D53BE440FEBFAA3ED2C88FFEB4C89DDFA471D7C783601
  • createdAtMillis - 1704807231876
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 174443714160876361500F8AE1115D13ED05E6D53BE440FEBFAA3ED2C88FFEB4C89DDFA471D7C783601