Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-08 19:36:40 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FBA2EE8FDA1EA9788C7009799916F289F5AED475BF7FA479C365198C682DB455
Participant Details

Original Note:

XXX. No proof that’s her https://www.science.org/content/article/fake-news-spreads-faster-true-news-twitter-thanks-people-not-bots

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1744386551507820966
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FBA2EE8FDA1EA9788C7009799916F289F5AED475BF7FA479C365198C682DB455
  • createdAtMillis - 1704742600508
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1744386551507820966FBA2EE8FDA1EA9788C7009799916F289F5AED475BF7FA479C365198C682DB455