Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-07 01:38:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. While I disagree with the tweet (which is clearly engagement bait) and appreciate the sources provided in the note, the tweet is an opinion and the contents of the note should be taken to the replies, not Community Notes. https://communitynotes.twitter.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1743708854431498250
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1704591531457
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1743708854431498250E5251A59C6E5EFDDBF1F4606EB6FD3F6DADB46FA1ACD6D1DCB0108D34D3BAA5F