Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-01-01 23:11:09 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A35C9988E621734EB9A8E08021A64EA28D160DAB9E9E1040CFAC05FBAAF57BBC
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. The critical note includes the phrase "no evidence," which is an argument from ignorance, and is also incorrect, because there is substantial evidence, when the proper definition of 'evidence' is applied. Also tweet expresses an opinion about a public health crisis. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/evidence

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1741814009001648167
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A35C9988E621734EB9A8E08021A64EA28D160DAB9E9E1040CFAC05FBAAF57BBC
  • createdAtMillis - 1704150669468
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1741814009001648167A35C9988E621734EB9A8E08021A64EA28D160DAB9E9E1040CFAC05FBAAF57BBC