Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-30 08:45:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B30668E50CC85FB08B44307CE09B3EAA6651F27E26DCE1679B04EFE15573A8A0
Participant Details

Original Note:

La conjunción “ni” puede usarse sola, y no necesariamente para adicionar negaciones, como indica la RAE en su acepción 5: 5. conj. copulat. No. U. sin otra negación anterior o posterior. Perdió el caudal y la honra; ni podía esperarse otra cosa de su conducta. https://dle.rae.es/ni

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1740915876486865272
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B30668E50CC85FB08B44307CE09B3EAA6651F27E26DCE1679B04EFE15573A8A0
  • createdAtMillis - 1703925927519
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1740915876486865272B30668E50CC85FB08B44307CE09B3EAA6651F27E26DCE1679B04EFE15573A8A0