Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-20 14:00:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DEC7F8A9B3344E0C6B6270F91DA7E65E97F4512287C0984A798B1C1D2B6EA468
Participant Details

Original Note:

Le texte aurait été rejeté si le RN avait voté contre (274 contre, 261 pour). Il a donc été voté grâce au soutien du RN, dont il n'aurait pas pu se passer. https://www.lemonde.fr/politique/live/2023/12/19/en-direct-projet-de-loi-immigration-l-assemblee-nationale-adopte-le-projet-de-loi-immigration-a-349-voix-pour-et-186-contre_6206507_823448.html

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1737256021536485598
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DEC7F8A9B3344E0C6B6270F91DA7E65E97F4512287C0984A798B1C1D2B6EA468
  • createdAtMillis - 1703080808889
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1737256021536485598DEC7F8A9B3344E0C6B6270F91DA7E65E97F4512287C0984A798B1C1D2B6EA468