Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 14:06:24 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B9847A6A4F66C5FF8A0ABC4122E5B9D27C7E393CFA3E607DE7EAB1794CE3E9E5
Participant Details

Original Note:

Some claims are convincing (Swain/Pitkin, King) and others less so. On the former, Gay appears not to attribute her sources, which has never been allowed. Others she cites without quotation marks-perhaps not explicit in 1997. Certainly worthy of investigation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734147684104061015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - B9847A6A4F66C5FF8A0ABC4122E5B9D27C7E393CFA3E607DE7EAB1794CE3E9E5
  • createdAtMillis - 1702303584966
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1734147684104061015B9847A6A4F66C5FF8A0ABC4122E5B9D27C7E393CFA3E607DE7EAB1794CE3E9E5