Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 20:36:08 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 98E2938D0FCBFEAAA5B3A07C3A80233AD080FEF3A0E9C2B931BD23E5D08D94E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

Some claims are convincing (Swain/Pitkin, King) and others less so. On the former, Gay appears not to attribute her sources, which has never been allowed. Others she cites without quotation marks-perhaps not explicit in 1997. Certainly worthy of investigation.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1734147684104061015
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 98E2938D0FCBFEAAA5B3A07C3A80233AD080FEF3A0E9C2B931BD23E5D08D94E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1702326968903
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 173414768410406101598E2938D0FCBFEAAA5B3A07C3A80233AD080FEF3A0E9C2B931BD23E5D08D94E6