Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-11 14:49:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0A63C154D998A98C788FCD905468BC5E6EAA135300C5D7942B2DB2A01F37128
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN/ Kolejny przykład, w którym CN nie są potrzebne, bo przedstawiana jest subiektywna opinia. Zamiast tego, powinny być użyte komentarze do wpisu.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733849553927844244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0A63C154D998A98C788FCD905468BC5E6EAA135300C5D7942B2DB2A01F37128
  • createdAtMillis - 1702306161204
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1733849553927844244F0A63C154D998A98C788FCD905468BC5E6EAA135300C5D7942B2DB2A01F37128