Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-10 16:19:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5EEF4D492AF4A9D59A0438F1426FDF6A1809A673B581929DA2226C70882FD7C5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN/ Kolejny przykład, w którym CN nie są potrzebne, bo przedstawiana jest subiektywna opinia. Zamiast tego, powinny być użyte komentarze do wpisu.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1733849553927844244
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5EEF4D492AF4A9D59A0438F1426FDF6A1809A673B581929DA2226C70882FD7C5
  • createdAtMillis - 1702225169860
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 17338495539278442445EEF4D492AF4A9D59A0438F1426FDF6A1809A673B581929DA2226C70882FD7C5