Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2023-12-07 21:11:10 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 837E94B73F20865791415197C955BE08CB4A5576CD1EB12042E8D3D78D82120C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Cet argumentaire "antivax" est fondé sur un dénombrement de décès de sujets vaccinés. L'argumentaire confond donc "correlation" et "causation", et relève de la désinformation habituelle, à visée antivax, tâche en général confiée à des trolls de ferme, souvent russes. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35034832/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1732818279469593056
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 837E94B73F20865791415197C955BE08CB4A5576CD1EB12042E8D3D78D82120C
createdAtMillis - 1701983470879
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1732818279469593056837E94B73F20865791415197C955BE08CB4A5576CD1EB12042E8D3D78D82120C